I’ve noticed that after the upgrade for the 10.5.2 application, the Association Type list in List Manager has what appears to be bad or inappropriate values. Also, it doesn’t appear that I can delete them. The check box that is normally displayed for each entry is missing. The inappropriate values include:
Changes related to the UX framework caused changes to be introduced to the application OM. These need to be cleaned up in applications where the 10.5.2 OM package has been applied. At this time, the entries can be left alone as they are not being used and have no impact. We are developing a solution to remove these invalid entries and this document will be updated once that is made available.
This was seen with TRIRIGA Application 10.5.2. The final amount for the Revised Funds is being discounted twice for positive or negative values…
Check the Revised Funds value. In the client’s example, it was expected to be $900,000.00 USD as only $100,000.00 was discounted out of $1 million USD. But it was discounted twice and it showed $800,000.00 in the Revised Funds column.
This defect focuses on the Real Estate Contract form > Clauses, Options, and Terms tab. When entering a specific duration, the Must Exercise By date is calculated incorrectly. Furthermore, there are other dates in the Exercise Date Notification that are also calculated incorrectly, but they are driven from the Must Exercise By field.
[Admin: The same article is also posted in the IBM Support Portal as a technote.]
TRIRIGA has the notion of project-based security scope, also called project context. At the upper right-hand side of the main TRIRIGA portal, there is a toggle to switch between Company and Project-level security, as well as a query to find and select in which project to operate.
To see and select a project, the user must be given specific security access to a project. This is done by adding the user’s group or the specific user to the Security tab of the project. Once the user or users have been granted access to the project, and they select the project from the project selector on the portal, they are then in the “context of the project.”
Any records created in the project context are then owned by that project, and security is restricted to those records, so the records are only visible and editable to those people that have access to the project, and have also switched their scope to run in that project context.
Items like documents and folders within Document Manager will also operate in a project context. You may notice that files uploaded to the Notes & Documents tab of records in the project context have a different folder path within Document Manager. Because the entire Document Manager tree is also in the project context, it is necessary to have the parent folder created in the project context as well. This folder’s path will be different than the uploads on records at the company level.
[Admin: This post is related to the 04.08.16 post about where your documents go in TRIRIGA, and the 08.25.16 post about an issue with selecting child projects.]
Basically, 2 in-frame popups are rendering from the Maintenance > Preventive Maintenance > Plan Work record.
To reproduce, create a new Plan Work record (Add button) and go to the PM Schedules section. Then click on the Add button. A popup will render for the PM Schedules. Then inside this popup, click on the Create Recurring Pattern link. The new popup will render inside the existing one, and that will have part of it off-screen, sometimes preventing users from selecting a radio button for the recurrence.
What were some of the most used technotes in 2016? The IBM Watson IoT Support team has compiled a list of the top twenty TRIRIGA troubleshooting technotes that were most accessed on the web in 2016. We hope that highlighting these technotes here will help with your troubleshooting efforts.
[Admin: This post is related to the 05.27.16 post about the top twenty TRIRIGA technotes of January-May 2016.]