ValuD: What are the best practices for TRIRIGA implementations?


Part 1: Leasing Software

Earlier posts focused on the best practices followed by ValuD during IBM TRIRIGA application upgrades. In this blog series, we highlight the best practices that ValuD advocates for an IBM TRIRIGA 10.5.3 leasing software implementation…

Continue reading

Part 2: Data Readiness

Our earlier blog focused on the key learning from ValuD’s 10.5.3 implementations. In the next couple of blogs, we list our recommendations for each stage of the implementation life cycle. In this post, we focus on data readiness, data migration, and the design phases…

Continue reading

Part 3: Journal Entries Setup

Continuing with our recommendations for each stage of the implementation life cycle, today we focus on the build process and general ledger (journal entry) integration steps…

Continue reading

Part 4: Testing & Training

In our final blog of this series, we list our recommendations for the last two phases of the implementation life cycle: TRIRIGA testing and training…

[Admin: This post is related to the 01.10.18 post, 08.07.17 post, and 09.24.15 post about the best practices for configuring and upgrading TRIRIGA applications. To see other related posts, use the Best Practices tag or Implementation tag.]

Continue reading

Advertisements

What is the best practice for deleting or retiring records?


I have some records in the classifications hierarchy. These classifications are now associated to several BOs, like building equipment and tasks. I want to delete some of the values in the classification hierarchy because they are values we do not want users to use in the future. I understand that the best practice is the change the status of the record to “Retire” for audit purposes. But if we decided to just delete those records, what is the impact to any of the associated BOs? Would I have to create a workflow to remove the associations?

There are certain classification records that are used in forms, workflows, and/or queries. If you delete one of these records that are used in the application, you will in effect, lose some application functionality. Take, for example, “triClauseType” (Lease Clause), where several of these classification values are used on the Lease Clause form to determine which sections of the clause to unhide.

I suggest a best practice would be to look in the Data Modeler for the business object of the classification you want to delete records on. Select the triNameTX field and click ‘Where Used’. If nothing comes back you should be pretty safe to make changes to that classifications record list (add, delete, modify). If you see any workflows, queries, forms, etc., come back as using this field, you’ll need to analyze each to determine if your business needs them. However, I’d suggest pushing back against the business and advise that the application requires the values in question.

[Admin: To see other related posts, use the Classifications tag or Hierarchy tag.]

Continue reading

Webinar: ValuD best practices of implementing TRIRIGA for FASB


Webinar: Thursday, September 14, 2017, 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM Eastern Time

Join ValuD’s Lease Accounting expert team in their Sept 14th webcast for “Best Practices of Implementing TRIRIGA for FASB Compliance” and get prepared to meet your FASB compliance deadline. Register here.

[Admin: The same announcement is also posted in the LinkedIn group. To see other related posts, use the ValuD tag or FASB tag.]

Continue reading

What are some better practices for lease accounting payments?


I have come across numerous TRIRIGA clients who run their monthly lease accounting payment schedules as one single synchronous task in TRIRIGA. Often, this slows down the response times and overall environment performance considerably. Here are some simple steps to consider as recommended better/best practices for your lease accounting payment schedule run as follows:

  • 1. Break up processing payments into batches that fit well with your business organizations or perhaps geographical regions.
  • 2. Each of these batches can be filtered when selecting the leases to process payments for and/or before Get Payments.

Note: This will limit the number of records to process, and the load that is put on the system, and possibly, make it easier to validate payments…

[Admin: To see other related posts, use the Accounting tag or Payments tag.]

Continue reading

What are the new best practices for upgrading TRIRIGA apps?


Object Labels and Revisions

Starting in TRIRIGA 3.5.3, consider converting the TRIRIGA as-shipped objects that you renamed and modified back to the TRIRIGA objects from which they originated.

The purpose of the new conversion process is to enable the objects to use the new TRIRIGA object revisioning capabilities while preserving your object modifications. When you make future modifications to the objects, the modifications are saved in object revisions. Ultimately, the object revisioning and object labeling capabilities and tools aid in the future upgrade of your TRIRIGA applications.

Resources

[Admin: This post is related to the 09.24.15 post about the best practices for configuring and upgrading TRIRIGA applications. To see other related posts, use the Best Practices tag or Object Label tag.]

Continue reading