Starting in IBM TRIRIGA 3.5.3, the Report Scheduler application provides administrators the ability to schedule and automate reports, queries, and external reports. Administrators can select the reports to run, setup a schedule and time, and identify who receives the reports. Once scheduled, the platform will run the reports, and send the them in an email notification as an attachment.
The application is found under Tools > System Setup > Report Scheduler.
[Admin: To see other related posts, use the Reports tag or My Reports tag.]
The SESSION_HISTORY table uses 500GB of disk space in our production environment. What is the best way to clean it up?
You would want to make appropriate backups and test this thoroughly, but this is something that can be done via the Platform Maintenance Scheduler (formerly Cleanup Agent) in the IBM TRIRIGA Admin Console. You can develop SQL to do the cleanups as they meet your business requirements, add that as a new cleanup command at the bottom section of the window, and then add a new Cleanup Schedule event in the top section of the window to have it run periodically.
This may be something that you want to reach out to a business partner for assistance with, depending on your skill and comfort level in implementing such a change. If so, you can search the IBM PartnerWorld portal.
[Admin: To see other related posts, use the Sessions tag or History tag.]
In one of our environments, we have a large amount of records that have been transitioned to the null state. When the Cleanup Agent runs, it runs out of DB2 transaction log space executing the following:
DELETE FROM IBS_SPEC_ASSIGNMENTS WHERE EXISTS (SELECT ‘X’ FROM IBS_SPEC_CA_DELETE WHERE IBS_SPEC_CA_DELETE.SPEC_ID=IBS_SPEC_ASSIGNMENTS.SPEC_ID)
For workflow instance saves, the Cleanup Agent now seems to remove the data in small chunks (of 1000 rows each). But for the record data cleanup, it still seems to (try to) remove all data in one huge SQL statement/transaction. Is it possible to get the Cleanup Agent to remove record data in chunks, like it does for workflow instance saves?
Otherwise, I’m thinking of writing a small util that would run the statement above, but in smaller chunks, since it seems we still have the list of record IDs that it tries to remove in the IBS_SPEC_CA_DELETE table. Any obvious issues with that?
As of 3.5.3, there have been no changes for the data to be deleted in chunks for IBS_SPEC_ASSIGNMENTS. This sounds like a good PMR. It is rarely recommended to delete records directly from the database, but in this circumstance, you might be okay. However, the IBS_SPEC_CA_DELETE only exists during the time the Cleanup Agent is running. It is dropped when the agent goes back to sleep.
[Admin: To see other related posts, use the Cleanup tag or SQL tag. As a side note, starting with version 3.4, the Cleanup Agent name was changed to Platform Maintenance Scheduler.]
We are running TRIRIGA 10.5.2 and 22.214.171.124. Some of our lease records are getting stuck in “Processing” status after we try to activate the record. Since it is processing, we have no buttons at the top to Revise, Save, etc. This only happens sometimes, and only to lease records that have payment schedules. From the looks of it, all the payment line items do get created. A couple questions:
- (1) Is there a fix to this to keep it from happening again?
- (2) Can these records that are stuck in processing be pushed to active or do they have to be re-entered?
I was actually able to apply a workflow fix provided by IBM so that this will not happen going forward. So far, it has been working as planned…
With regards to getting the leases “unstuck”, I created an editable query, imported the State Transition Actions (on the Advanced tab in the query form), and ran the report to select and process the “stuck” leases. This worked with no issues and I did not have to delete or retire the leases. They were functioning properly after getting them out of the “Processing” state.
[Admin: This post is related to the 01.12.16 post about records getting stuck. To see other related posts, use the Performance tag or Workflow tag.]
I have come across numerous TRIRIGA clients who run their monthly lease accounting payment schedules as one single synchronous task in TRIRIGA. Often, this slows down the response times and overall environment performance considerably. Here are some simple steps to consider as recommended better/best practices for your lease accounting payment schedule run as follows:
- 1. Break up processing payments into batches that fit well with your business organizations or perhaps geographical regions.
- 2. Each of these batches can be filtered when selecting the leases to process payments for and/or before Get Payments.
Note: This will limit the number of records to process, and the load that is put on the system, and possibly, make it easier to validate payments…
[Admin: To see other related posts, use the Accounting tag or Payments tag.]
I know that TRIRIGA SaaS comes with predefined ETL jobs, and one of them is energy log fact. I have some energy logs on some buildings. However, all of my attempts to run the ETL job for energy logs have failed. Is there any missing parameter for me to add to make this work? I did try adding triEnvEnergyItem as a BO name, but no luck.
The ETLs each require different inputs depending on the ETL. Since, in general, ETL processing is a background process and runs through the scheduler, you would need to look in the server.log to see what the ETL needs if you are running it directly from the ETL Job form. You would also need to make sure that you have a license that allows you to run the ETLs, which would be a license that grants privileges to “Technology Metrics”.
Maybe this link will help: ETL and Metric Query Troubleshooting.
[Admin: To see other related posts, use the ETL tag.]
If a work task has a calendar and the “Planned End” or “Actual End” date-time field values are updated, the “Working Hours” are not always calculated correctly. The working hours do not seem to factor in the calendar hours.
The working hours were not being calculated correctly. The issue was that the values for the calendar fields (Year, Month, Day, etc.) were not being set correctly. The fix was to set the calendar fields exactly as we do for the other calculation methods. Moving forward, we resolved a work task record and Gantt chart issue, where the Actual Working Hours and Actual Working Days were not being correctly calculated when an Actual End date value was entered.
[Admin: To see other related posts, use the Calendar tag or Gantt tag.]