I’ve noticed that after the upgrade for the 10.5.2 application, the Association Type list in List Manager has what appears to be bad or inappropriate values. Also, it doesn’t appear that I can delete them. The check box that is normally displayed for each entry is missing. The inappropriate values include:
Changes related to the UX framework caused changes to be introduced to the application OM. These need to be cleaned up in applications where the 10.5.2 OM package has been applied. At this time, the entries can be left alone as they are not being used and have no impact. We are developing a solution to remove these invalid entries and this document will be updated once that is made available.
I watched the TRIRIGA 3.5.2 video by Raphael on triplat-ds-search-input, but I could not entirely follow it. I’m new to TRIRIGA UX, and would like to play around with this feature. I tried to follow as closely as I could, but I seem to get the following issue…
As you can see, it gets stuck on loading results (expecting 2 records to show as there are 2 people records with name that has “Hui”). Currently, snippets of my codes can be seen here related to <triplat-ds-search-input>… I noticed that the [[appendFilters]] is actually an empty array. Is that how it’s supposed to be? Also, would there be any sample source codes uploaded for our reference?
Our client has asked us to change the alignment in the results of a query column from left-justified to center. Is it possible in TRIRIGA 126.96.36.199? While I don’t think it is, since I haven’t been able to find any related option, I would appreciate any input.
Correct, the TRIRIGA Report Manager is a simple reporting tool. It’s mainly used to search, sort, and filter data from the TRIRIGA business objects, but there really isn’t much control for the layout that you can get out of a more advanced reporting tool. That said, the new TRIRIGA UX framework gives developers full control of formatting and styles using HTML5 and CSS, and you can display the data in a table/grid or whatever UI component you choose. Hope this helps.
We have a smart section listing the user permissions on a BO in the classic forms view that we need to access from the UX framework. I saw some posts about smart section BOs in the beta Slack channel from late August last year.
But I cannot get it to work with the suggested method, since the field I am looking for is in the triPeopleLink BO (triPeople module), yet the association to the record is to the triPeople BO (triPeople module). Does anyone have an idea on how to access this smart section data located in the triPeopleLink BO?
The UX Framework does not provide the functionality to achieve that yet. You can open a request for enhancement (RFE) for that functionality.
[Admin: This post is related to the 08.30.16 post about using smart sections to open records in UX.]
I’m not sure if the supported OS list includes iOS officially. With the advent of iPad Pro devices, the line between iPhone-like devices and computers gets further blurred. After all, an iPad Pro begins to feel a lot like a MacBook Air. There is support for Safari on a computer as well, and generally the move is to become device-agnostic.
But I need to put forth some guidance about iPad Pro devices and TRIRIGA. My initial observation is that some basic functions don’t work correctly, perhaps HTML5 related? For example, rendering the portal. The page starts loading correctly, then the screen jiggers a bit and seems to stabilize, but scroll bars never appear and the user cannot move up or down. I’ve tested in both Safari and Chrome.
Official support of IBM TRIRIGA on iPad is limited to the IBM TRIRIGA UX Framework and Perceptive Applications. Traditional TRIRIGA, portal, and non-UX applications are only supported on Windows and Mac OS X operating systems when running Safari, Chrome, Edge, Firefox, or IE11. Although a lot of non-UX TRIRIGA will load on an iPad, you will run into some limitations as you have noted above…
I’m trying to establish the connection between WebViewSync and the TRIRIGA Sales VM, which I’m running on my Mac through a VMware Fusion VM.
I have the JAR file up and running, created all of the necessary TRIRIGA records, and connected to the TRIRIGA server, but I am unable to locate or retrieve my Web View Metadata record (Exposed Name = tut-people) and thus, unable to create the initial HTML file. Any thoughts as to what the error might be?
[Admin: This post is related to the 08.02.16 post and 06.01.16 post about having issues with WebViewSync.]
We’re unable to run an object migration (OM) comparison on the TRIRIGA 3.5.1 platform, when we select the background option. When we try to run a compare after loading the OM package on the 3.5.1 platform, it repeats the same rows in the object migration log file.
It appears to keep re-running the compare multiple times (about 1 hour per run), and it does not work or present results. Specifically, the problem happens when the background comparison result is run, and the OM package contains UX Metadata (used in the UX Framework).